Monday, 25 April 2016

LPP Module 4

Summarise:
Erkison's Theory of Psychosocial Development:
  • How people grow and develop as individuals;
  • 8 stages 'crises' of psychosocial development;
    • Trust/Mistrust (Infancy);
    • Autonomy/Shame (Toddlerhood);
    • Initiative/Guilt (Pre-school);
    • Industry/Inferiority (Primary Years);
    • Identity/Role Confusion (Adolescence);
    • Intimacy/Isolation (Young Adulthood);
    • Generativity/Stagnation (Middle Years);
    • Integrity/Despair (Retirement Years).
  • Each crisis does not need to be fully positively resolved before the next begins;
  • People advance when they have developed more of the positive than the negative tendency;
  • Stages without positive resolution can be revisieted and resolved later;
  • Qualitatively different concerns about the self;
  • Positive outcomes of Erikson's theory include recognition of:
    • Lifelong development;
    • Dynamic syntheses of nature, nurture, and the individual's motivation;
    • Optimistic view of development
  • Criticisms include:
    • Largely anecdotal research;
    • Identity rarely fully formed by the end of adolescence;
    • Gender differences not accounted for;
    • Underestimated cultural influence.

Characteristics of children's attachment security:
  • Securely Attached:
    • Will use attachment figure(s) as safe haven and as base of exploration;
    • Will protest when attachment figure separates;
    • Will greet the attachment figure with smiles and by moving towards them when reunited;
    • Initial wariness of strangers;
    • Need support at transitions;
    • Need consistent primary caregiver while away from attachment figure, will often develop secure attachment to this primary caregiver;
    • Maintain communication and consistency between home and care facility.
  • Insecure-aviodant Attachment:
    • May not notice if attachment figure leaves;
    • Indifference to attachment figure's return, may avert gaze;
    • Engage superficially with toys and environment;
    • Discomfort around strangers without seeking comfort of caregiver;
    • Seek to engage child with play;
    • Build affectionate relationships.
  • Insecure-Resistant Attachment:
    • Clingyness to attachment figure and anxiety;
    • Distress upon attachment figure's departure;
    • Continued distress after attachment figure's return, anger;
    • Fear of strangers;
    • Provide consistent primary caregiver to develop secure attachment with;
    • Provide extra time and support during handover transitions;
    • Comfort objects may be of use;
    • Patience, understanding, reasurance, consistency.
  • Disorganised/Disoriented Attachment:
    • Inconsistent responses to stressful events, apparent contentment followed by fear or anger responses;
    • Unpredictable emotions;
    • Cautious approaches to attachment figures;
    • Failure to seek out caregiver when upset;
    • Indiscriminately friendly between unknown adults and family members;
    • Excessive concern for attachment figure / role reversal;
    • Reckless exploration without regard for attachment figure as secure base;
    • Provide consistent primary caregiver to develop secure attachment with;
    • Work hard to establish positive, warm, trusting relationships;
    • Pay close attention, closely monitor for signs of abuse;
    • Seek help from support agencies if necessary.

Personal development characteristics of adolescents:
  • Frequent fluctuations in mood;
  • Careful regulations of emotion;
  • Variation in conformation to cultural and gender roles;
  • Seeking emotional intimacy with peers;
  • Seeking comfort from peers in timmes of emotional distress;
  • Privacy toward connecitons to parents/family;
  • Can experience significant conflict in family settings;
  • Can experiment with / rely on drugs and alcohol as a coping mechanism;
  • Particularly girls may excessively ruminate over small disapointments;
  • Particularly boys may hide their emotions under false ones;
  • Listen authentically;
  • Help provide perspective on family conflicts;
  • Be alert for students showing signs of depression/suicide and provide support including referring to counsellors.

Support strategies for classroom teachers to promote positive social emotional development:
  • Show an interest in students' persuits and wellbeing;
  • Teach social skills;
  • Provide structure/scaffolding for students with high anxiety;
  • Set reasonable limits for acceptable behaviour, establish rules and consequences and follow up;
  • Give a sense of control/autonomy, provide reasonable choices;
  • Communicate with parents/family regarding students' needs;
  • Be alert for signs of depression/suicide:
    • pervasive sadness, helplessness;
    • sudden withdrawal from peers and caregivers;
    • disregard for personal appearnace/hygeine;
    • serious health problems;
    • dramatic personality change;
    • sudden elevation in mood;
    • preoccupation with death/morbid themes;
    • overt or veiled threats;
    • actions that indicate putting one's affairs in order;
    • serious problems at home, school or in the community;
    • substance abuse;
    • efforts to obtain suicidal means.


Summarise:
The four ways parents help children to develop emotional intelligence:
  • Help children identify their emotions;
  • Help children learn to find calm in times of distress;
  • Help children learn to read other people's emotions;
  • Help children learn to predict the actions/responses of others in given situations.

The link between emotional intelligence and academic achievement:
  • EQ strongly linked to academic performance;
  • High EQ helps youth manage complexities and pressures that would otherwise derail them;
  • Students with higher EQs are less likely to have isses with school attendance or drop out of high school;
  • Students who persist with further education show significantly higher EQs;
  • Students who persist in educational contexts are more likely to result in:
    • Higher socio-economic status;
    • Lower levels of criminality and incarceration.

The link between emotional intelligence and behaviour:
  • Higher EQ appears to equate to:
    • Greater interpersonal competency;
    • Greater adaptability;
    • Better stress management;
    • Less aggressive behaviour;
    • Increased social acceptedness;
    • Increased cooperation;
    • Increased leadership skills;
    • Less disruptive & destructive behaviours;
    • Lower use of alcohol and other drugs;
    • Lower anxiety levels;
    • Greater overall health;
    • Greater overall contentedness/success in life persuits;
    • Helps teens make more complex, sophisticated, pro-social decisions.


Define sense of self. What are the differences between self concept, self worth/esteem and self efficacy?
  • Self Concept:
    • Ideas/beliefs about the self;
    • 'Who am I as a person?'
  • Self Esteem:
    • How much we love ourselves;
    • 'How good am I as a person?';
    • How valuable am I as an individual.
  • Self Efficacy:
    • How good we feel we are at certain endeavours, how effective;
    • 'How effective am I? How good am I at ... ?'

Why is sense of self important?
  • Enables students to:
    • understand themselves;
    • understand themselves in relation to others;
    • envision various future versions fo themselves;
    • set goals for the future and work towards them;
    • find a comfortable niche/place in the world where they feel capable, cared for and connected;

  • Children tend to behave in ways that mirror their self-perceptions:
    • Thus these self-percetions are compounded by children's actions;
    • This can lead to positive or negative outcomes depending on the beliefs that the child is operating out of.

What factors influence sense of self?
  • Past behaviours and performances;
  • Influence of adults within the child's life ascribing to them certain characteristics which the child accepts as truth;
  • Nurture and affection from caregivers;
  • Parents accepting children as they are - celebrating abilities and taking inabilities in their stride;
  • Educator high yet achievable expectations and support to reach goals;
  • Peer group acceptance;
  • Comparisons with peers;
  • Positive group/club social experiences & achievements;
  • Biology.

Outline the three levels and six stages of Kohlberg's moral reasoning:
  • Preconventional:
    • Children have not yet internalised conventions of right and wrong;
    • Preschool, most primary, some early secondary, few later years students;
    • Level 1 - Decisions based on self-interest without regard for others, punishment aviodance and obedience;
    • Level 2 - Decisions based on exchange of favor / recognition of the needs of others gaining assertion that their own needs may be met, 
  • Conventional:
    • Acceptance of society's notions of right and wrong;
    • Few older primary, some lower secondary, many later years students;
    • Level 3 - Decisions based on pleasing others, especially authority figures;
    • Level 4 - Look to society's rules on law and order to define right and wrong, inflexible.
  • Postconventional:
    • Own sense of personal morality, of which society's standards may play a somewhat flexible part;
    • Rarely seen before university, extremely rare even in adult populations (?);
    • Stage 5 - Social contracts, agreements within groups to maintain order and protect rights, recognise flexibility in rules/laws to suit needs of the people that they serve;
    • Stage 6 - Adherance to abstract universal principles, strong inner conscience, willing to disobey laws that contradict their ethical principles.

What are some of the limitations of Kohlberg's work?
  • Included both moral issues and social conventions, while children view these issues separately;
  • Overlooked helping and showing compassion;
  • emphasised cognition over emotional influence;
  • Emphasised introspective processes failing to take into consideration influence of parents and significant adults in the moral reasoning of children;
  • Overlooked situational factors such as "white lies";
  • About how children think morally, not about if they will act morally (though the two are intertwined).

How does Kohlberg's thinking differ from that of Piaget?
  • Piaget defined two broad stages in moral development:
    • Heternormous - rules as permanent and requiring strict obedience, authority outside themselves, define good/bad actions according to percieved consequences;
    • Autonomous moral thinking - ability to see self and others as moral actors and see moral decisiona as embeded in social environments.
How is cognitive development linked to moral development?
  • Advanced moral reasoning required reflective capacities regarding the consequences and experiences for the self and others which are only available if the child has developed these advanced (abstract) cognitive abilities;
  • Cognitive development does not however guarantee moral development, moral reasoning may still take place at a preconventional level;

How can teachers support their students' moral development?
  • Clarification of acceptable, non-acceptable and conditionally acceptable behaviours;
  • Including discussions of WHY in disciplinary actions or when introducing rules;
  • Encourage children to make amends for misdeeds;
  • Engaging students in discussions on moral issues, relates to social context &/or subject matter;
  • Addressing moral questions/issues from various viewpoints;
  • Challenging reasoning with slightly more advanced reasoning, using Kohlberg's stages to identify levels to operate from;
  • Community service - working towards moral causes and projects of community benefit;
  • 'Fostering a climate of tolerance' RESPECT for differences.








No comments:

Post a Comment